28 September 2018

How To Delink Your Aadhaar from Bank Accounts, Mobile Number, E-wallets

With the Supreme Court declaring Section 57 of the Aadhaar Act as unconstitutional, bank account-holders, e-wallet or mobile wallet users and mobile subscribers are no longer required to use their Aadhaar number.


In fact, those who have already linked their Aadhaar number with bank account and mobile numbers can delink it. Some banks have already started allowing customers to delink Aadhaar number from their account numbers. Others will have to follow suit after the judgement by the Supreme Court. 

At the same time, a few banks like ICICI Bank are continuing to bombard its customers with a message to get an Aadhaar number from its enrolment centres. 

 
Mobile wallet company Paytm is still asking people for Aadhaar number. On Thursday morning, one of our readers Prasad S found four-five executives from Paytm selling account for free with just an Aadhaar number. When Mr Prasad confronted them, they backed out and said the customer can provide any other valid ID proof.

Here is what the Supreme Court has stated about use of Aadhaar by private entities, in its 26th September judgement on Aadhaar…

 

Page 560-561:

(h) Insofar as Section 57 in the present form is concerned, it is susceptible to misuse inasmuch as:

a) It can be used for establishing the identity of an individual ‘for any purpose’. We read down this provision to mean that such a purpose has to be backed by law. Further, whenever any such “law” is made, it would be subject to judicial scrutiny. 

b) Such purpose is not limited pursuant to any law alone but can be done pursuant to ‘any contract to this effect’ as well. This is clearly impermissible as a contractual provision is not backed by a law and, therefore, first requirement of proportionality test is not met. 

c) Apart from authorising the State, even ‘any body corporate or person’ is authorised to avail authentication services, which can be on the basis of purported agreement between an individual and such body corporate or person.

Even if we presume that legislature did not intend so, the impact of the aforesaid features would be to enable commercial exploitation of an individual biometric and demographic information by the private entities. 

Thus, this part of the provision, which enables body corporate and individuals also to seek authentication, that too on the basis of a contract between the individual and such body corporate or person, would impinge upon the right to privacy of such individuals. This part of the section, thus, is declared unconstitutional. 

So, here is how you can delink your Aadhaar from bank account, e-wallet or mobile number...

1. Visit official website of your bank, e-wallet or mobile service-provider. Login to your account and in your personal details or profile, find the option to de-link your Aadhaar number from the account. Once de-linked you will receive an SMS confirming the same. 

2. If there is no provision for online de-linking of Aadhaar, then use the form below and submit it to the branch manager of the bank where you have an account. Do not forget to take acknowledgement on your letter from the Branch Manager with bank's stamp/seal for letters. Since many bank branches share their email ID as well, you can send the application given below through email with a copy to senior officials in the bank.  

3. For other service-providers, you will have to send the same form with some modifications by email to the customer services. In that case, make sure you have enabled read receipt for the email. 

4. Email IDs of most of the chairmen, managing directors (MD) and chief executives (CEO) can be found on Internet. Most of these would be generic, like chairman@xxxx.com or md@xxxxx.com or ceo@xxxxx.com
 

Application for Delinking Aadhaar Number


 

Date: 

 

Branch Manager

xxxx Bank

Address:

(for mobile and e-wallets, write to the Head-Customer Services with copy to CEO/MD)

Subject: Delinking my Aadhaar Number from my bank account/mobile number/e-wallet as per order from the Supreme Court of India dated 26 September 2018

Reference: My bank account no. xxxxxx/mobile no. xxxx/ e-wallet ID...... (delete whichever is not required)

In exercise of my Fundamental Rights to Life and Liberty, Privacy Rights and other Fundamental Rights conferred upon me by Part III of Indian Constitution, I hereby absolutely revoke the permission granted by me to cite, use, quote, manage or in any other way deal with the following:

(1) My Aadhaar number,

(2) My Aadhaar card photocopy,

(3) My demographic information,

(4) My biometric details, including fingerprints and iris scan etc.

The list is just illustrative and must not be treated as exhaustive. 

The above-mentioned prohibitions include, but are not limited to; Aadhaar based E-KYC or other authentication or identification methods using Aadhaar in any manner whatsoever.

Please note that as per the order from the Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court, Aadhaar is absolutely optional for all purposes including Jan Dhan accounts, bank accounts, mobile number verifications, stock dealings, passports, provident fund, pensions, salary, and admissions. Please seefor the order of Supreme Court and other details that clearly prove that Aadhaar is absolutely optional for enrolment and linking.

This application has been made in duplicate and you are requested to countersign on my copy to acknowledge the due receipt of the same. Any further dealing with my Aadhaar number or details in any manner whatsoever after the date of this application would be treated as violation of my Fundament and Statutory Rights and I reserve all rights to take legal action you for the same.

Sincerely yours,

 

Name & Signature

 

Date: 

Place:

 

CC

1. MD/CEO of the bank/mobile service-provider/e-wallet (send letter to registered address/ emails you can find out from the Internet)

 

23 September 2018

IIT-G students file PIL against Super 30 founder Anand Kumar, call him fraud

Kaushik Deka


Anand Kumar's Super 30 claims to select 30 meritorious students from economically weaker sections each year to prepare them for the IIT entrance exam.

HIGHLIGHTS

PIL against Super 30 founder Anand Kumar says he takes Rs 33,000 from IIT aspirants for coaching

Petition says Kumar claimed 26 out of 30 of his students cleared IIT entrance this year but has not released their names

Another PIL in Patna HC has also accused Kumar of claiming students from other institutes as his own

Four months before the release of a biopic on his life starring Hrithik Roshan, Patna-based mathematician Anand Kumar has found himself at the centre of yet another controversy. Four students of IIT Guwahati have claimed that Anand Kumar, the founder of coaching institute Super 30, is a fraud.

On September 21, the Guwahati High Court issued a notice to Kumar, the founder of the educational programme 'Super 30', to reply to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the students. Senior advocate Ashok Saraf, appearing for the four IIT students, submitted before the court that, "Because of the wrong projection given by Anand Kumar each year a large number of students from the Northeast and other parts of the country approach him with full faith and hope that Anand Kumar, who seems to be an IIT Baba, will help them in qualifying the IIT entrance exam."

"But after reaching there, Anand Kumar makes the students take admission in his coaching institute, namely Ramanujam School of Mathematics, by charging Rs 33,000 per student in the name of teaching them," Saraf said.

Founded in 2002, Patna's Super 30 claims that it selects 30 meritorious students each year from economically backward sections of society and provides them free coaching for the IIT entrance examination. The institute made headlines in 2008 with 100 per cent success rate in the IIT-Joint Entrance Exam (IIT-JEE). Though the institute started to make a mark in 2004, it was for the first time in 2008 that all 30 students picked up for Super-30 batch qualified the IIT JEE. The group also made it to the Time Magazine in 2010.

Amit Goyal, who is the advocate-on-record for the petitioners, said it is mentioned in the PIL that "Most of the time, Anand Kumar travels to different places in the country and outside India. He does not devote sufficient time to the IIT aspirants who took admission in Ramanujam School of Mathematics".

"Upon inquiry by the four IIT-G students it was revealed that after 2008, Anand Kumar is not running any so-called 'Super 30' classes. Whenever IIT entrance exam results are announced, Kumar appears before the media with some students of the Ramanujam School of Mathematics and other students claiming that they are Super 30 students and have qualified in the IIT entrance exam," Goyal said.

Saraf submitted before the court that the false propaganda created by Anand Kumar is not only cheating IIT aspirants and their guardians but also others.

"Wrong information has been uploaded by Wikipedia on its website in an unedited version and the same is also published by a national newspaper and it is easily available on social media," Goyal said.

According to the petition, this year too, Anand Kumar has claimed that 26 out of 30 students from his 'Super 30' group have cleared the IIT entrance exam. "But till now, he has not disclosed the names of the 26 students who had qualified for the IIT entrance," he said.

The Guwahati High Court also issued a notice to former Bihar Director General of Police (DGP) Abhiyanand who had co-founded 'Super 30' in 2002. A division bench of the High Court, comprising Chief Justice (acting) Arup Kumar Goswami and Justice Ajit Borthakur, issued the notice to Kumar and directed him to reply to the allegations made in the PIL. The matter will be taken up by the court again after eight weeks.

This is not the first time such allegations have been made against Super 30. In July, a PIL was filed in Patna High Court seeking a CBI probe into the functioning of Kumar's group. High court advocate Manibhushan Pratap Sengar claimed in his petition that Kumar showed students of other institutes as his own. The petition also alleged that he never released the list of students before the IIT exam so it cannot be verified that those students who had qualified were the same ones who had studied at Super 30.

Sengar has sought inquiry into the financial activities, assets and transactions of Super 30 and the Ramanujan Institute of Mathematics at Kumhrar, Patna.

Several former students in the past also claimed that Kumar took a cut from other coaching centres as he passed on students to other institutes.